Guides

AI as a tool: the 6 levels of use, from spellcheck to full generation

AI is here to stay - like the internet. Instead of bans, what's needed is transparency and clear rules that build trust. PlagiatGPT's six levels of AI use provide a universal framework for that: from school to marketing to academia.

!

In short

AI use isn't yes/no, it's a scale with six levels: from level 0 (no AI) through spelling help, rewriting, research assistance and AI-assisted structuring up to level 5 (full text generation by AI). The scale is deliberately discipline-agnostic — it works for a school essay just as much as for a marketing text.

Why a scale instead of a line

"Is AI use allowed?" rarely has a useful yes/no answer. AI-assisted spellchecking is fundamentally different from a fully AI-generated paper — yet both often get lumped together. A level scale makes the actual question discussable: not whether, but how much and for what.

THE SCALE IN DETAIL

The 6 levels of use

0

No AI

The text is produced entirely without AI tools — the reference level every other level is compared against.

1

Spelling & grammar

AI corrects typos and grammar without changing content or phrasing — comparable to a classic spellchecker.

2

Rewriting & style

AI helps make already-existing sentences clearer or more polished — the content stays entirely the human's own.

3

Research assistance

AI helps gather, summarize or contextualize information — the actual drafting and phrasing stays with the human.

4

(Partial) content and structure by AI

AI suggests an outline or structure and produces a draft of the article. The human takes over parts of it entirely in places, but rewrites most of it. AI drafts, the human rewrites.

5

Full text generation

AI produces the complete text, the human adopts it largely unchanged. The level most discussions about "AI use" are actually about — without naming it that way.

🛈

What this scale is really for: it makes AI use transparent instead of just bannable. An examination policy, an editorial guideline, or a usage declaration can set concretely up to which level something is allowed - instead of a blanket, barely enforceable "no AI" rule that nobody can check consistently.

Free PDF summary

The 6 levels of use as a print-ready A4 one-pager - to print, post, or use as the basis for your own policy.

Frequently asked questions

That depends on context — an examination policy or editorial guideline sets which levels are allowed. The scale is what makes that decision discussable in the first place; it doesn't make the decision itself.

No, deliberately not. The same level 3 (research assistance) describes both a student using ChatGPT for outline ideas and a content team using AI for research summaries.

Set, per context, up to which level use is allowed, and require disclosure above a certain level. The grading rubric and usage declaration templates build directly on this scale.

📖 3 min read 🗓️ Updated August 11, 2026

As a former lecturer, Simon has spent over ten years working with digital products - and has followed the topic of AI from day one. For him, the technology itself is not the problem, but rather the lack of transparency and unclear rules for fair use.

Keywordsai as a tool, ai assistance levels, how much ai is allowed, ai usage scale, ai policy guideline

Check for free now

No sign-up, nothing stored — results in under a minute.